Ponder This

Hello beautiful souls. I hope you have found gratitude in your day. I was thinking about the concept of birth. I wanted to flip it on its head. What if what they call our birth is actually a long death? What if the soul existence before the physical incarnation is chosen is actually our birth, and the physical “birth” is actually our letting go into the death of the concept of the soul mechanism?

I have been pondering this lately. If the soul existence is one where there is no emotion or material existence, then do we choose to die to be able to experience emotional and material concepts to further our lessons in advancement toward a pure source existence? It would seem that from this perspective, both concepts are limited as far as what they can accomplish toward the direction of ascension. The physical cannot ascend through its own mechanisms, and the soul cannot ascend without experiencing and learning those mechanisms lessons. Now that we have approached that viewpoint, are we ever truly born, or are we always in a state of death no matter the dimension of existence?

Death would seem to be the ultimate state of letting go. Letting go of attachments, vices, material wealth, friendships, romances, egoic responses, and everything else. It would seem that none of this can be let go in a soul existence because the soul never truly has these things. If all the soul can truly possess is memory, then how can it remember the things it never possessed in the first place? I find this line of questioning fascinating. Are we ever really alive?

It would seem that when we choose to incarnate in the physical, for ascension purposes, the goal seems to be learn to die before our physical deaths. A life of lessons in living past lives in our current life. We all live many past lives in each existence. With every lesson learned, it changes us and our perspectives. When this happens, the “old us” dies and a new one comes on the scene with a new perspective. It happens over and over again through our lives. The young us is not the same as the teenage us. The mid life us is not the same as the elderly us. We continually choose to kill the old versions of ourselves the more we learn. We choose to die over and over again as we approach the “physical death”. When we get to an established understanding of how we feel we want to see ourselves, then we achieve the soul contract of why we chose to experience this current existence. We are then granted access back to the soul realm through our physical death. Is this a birth? Or, is it just what is always there being neither born nor killed?

Since our souls are pieces of the source, and it is said that the source has no beginning and no end, were we truly ever born? It appears we just seem to go into multiple experiences learning to let go and die over and over again, while the soul mechanism is always there in all dimensional experiences. We just seem to choose avatars to experience a different perspective and learn how to repay our karma acquired through each experience. The energy remains constant through all the experiences, so from that perspective, are we ever really born and does death really exist? The death of self exists when we realize there is no self, but the energy or our soul spectrum is infinite. It would seem that we have never been born, and death is just a phase to a different level of existence, so we really never truly die passed the physical limitations we put on through labels defining the experience.

Now comes the question of the soul family. It is said that the same souls tend to reincarnate over and over again with each other playing different roles in each existence. This has been proven through multiple studies of hypnotic past life regressions. It would appear that a chunk, not just a piece of source chooses to learn together and experience continuously. Since we appear to break off in a group, does that mean that we are in essence the same soul in that spectrum? Essentially enabling quantum computing from multiple viewpoints simultaneously. And while we are on that topic, is there really more than just one soul in all experiences? The soul of the source appears to spread out in multiplicity to experience different viewpoints of scenarios playing out. So it really does seem that we are all source and are caught in the distraction of separation on a cosmic level. Going out experiencing, learning and trying to remember that only through unification can the reassembled source be defined as THE ALL.

It would seem that source is running a simulation program, acting out all possible outcomes and experiences. I find this extremely compelling. Also, I find it interesting when you look into the old books that have not been revised or edited to fit specific narratives, it clearly says that the God created the heavens and the earth, but the words used indicate an implication of the cosmos as a whole. This would in essence be the simulation. The original manuscripts did not give credit to Source, God, the Creator, as creating humans. It says they created them. It also says, let us make man in our image. If this is supposedly god stating this, who or what is in the consistency of using they, us and our? The use of Elohim in biblical text implies a non singular form. It literally means “gods” plural. Is there a source, for source? Then they have Adonai, which is something having power, authority, or influence. A ruler or master. So, is source possibly the soul of Source. Is there a spirit mechanism that reigns dominion over spirit? Also, going back to the simulation theory, in a game for example, there is coding for the background buildings, land mass, flora and fauna, and characters part of the game. If we are in a simulation, how many real souls are playing the game? How many people are actually people and not simulated characters of the background?

It seems more and more these days, you run into people who just seem to be vacant, without conscious and empathy. Perhaps the ones who do the most “evil” acts in society are in fact soulless coded characters to play out a chapter to learn and progress through. Since we are currently approaching 8 billion people on this planet they say, is it possible that number is much smaller as far as actual souls who are playing the simulation and not just characters coded for the “game of life”? The soulless character would explain the actions people do that we often times find inexplicable. For example, what we define as psychopaths could be easily explained from the concept of a soulless simulated character acting as an obstacle sent for a learning experience to either hinder or encourage growth in perspective. It could also be used to account for past karmic transgressions. The ones they kill could have very easily done wrong in a past life and are held accountable through characters of the simulation. This big movement to awaken may just be easier than what we think it to be, if we approach it from the perspective of how many real souls are actually incarnated here. We just need to use discernment and vigilance on what we choose to direct our soul energy toward, because the rest is there as background noise. How much of “existence” is “real”?

These are just some things that I have been thinking about lately. These are just my perspectives on these issues. I would greatly welcome your input on these questions. Any and all input and perspectives are welcome. If what we have been referring to as a soul family is not only pieces of source soul, but pieces of sources souls soul, that would bring a whole new conundrum into play in the “god” perspective. If we are perhaps just one soul that is pieced out over the cosmos that is all the pieces of a greater soul, the only way to truly solve our problems is bringing all perspectives together and find the commonality in observation. I love all of you and look forward to your thoughts on these questions.